DATASTREME LIT MEMBER QUESTIONNAIRE
                            Fall Semester 2000

Directions: We would appreciate it if you would respond to the following
by e-mail (amsedu@dc.ametsoc.org) or fax (1-800-258-1176) at your
earliest convenience. If you are able to e-mail, you may delete responses
other than your choice or print a hardcopy of the questionnaire first and
then send us an e-mail reply with the answers preceded by the item number.

A. In your opinion:
  1. The course as a whole was:               Good       Fair       Poor
  2. The course science content was:          Good       Fair       Poor
  3. The course study materials were:         Good       Fair       Poor
  4. The course Internet delivery was:        Good       Fair       Poor
  5. The weekly mentoring process was:        Good       Fair       Poor
  6. Offering the course through LITs         Well    Adequately   Poorly
     worked:
  7. Your level of enthusiasm for the         High     Moderate     Low
     DataStreme course:
  8. The teacher training value of the     Significant  Little      None
     course: 
  9. Potential for long-term cooperation   Significant  Little      None
     among LIT members, participants, NWS
     and other meteorologists: 
  10. The LIT - DataStreme Central working    Good       Fair       Poor
      relationship was:
 
Comments on any of the above:



  B. To the best of your knowledge and as the result of DataStreme participation,
     the extent to which participants are:
  11. Employing current weather information      Daily      Weekly    Some
      in their classroom:
  12. Interacting with other teachers about    Great deal    Some     None
      weather study:
  13. Expressing enthusiasm for their          Great deal    Some     None
      DataStreme experience:
  14. Preparing to become Weather Education    Great deal    Some     None
      Resource Teachers:
  15. Employing new computer/Internet skills:  Great deal    Some     None
  
Comments on any of the above:





C. What would you most want DataStreme Central, AMS, and/or NSF to know about
   the DataStreme course:














D. To be answered by persons who were also LIT members in Spring 2000:

16. Compare the Fall and Spring DataStreme offerings in terms of LIT operation,
    time commitment, participants, etc.

    Fall better ___     About the same ___     Spring better ___

Comments:







17. Extent of continued interactions between you and DataStreme "alums" from
    previous semesters (Spring 2000 or earlier).

    Much ___             Some ___             None ___

Comments:








18. Extent of interactions among DataStreme participants from previous semesters
    (Sprng 2000 or earlier).

    Much ___          Some ___          None ___          Unknown ___

Comments:









       (Reminder: Return this to DataStreme Central as soon as possible!)
                              Thank You